<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time Shifting and Scaling of Functions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://engineersphere.com/math/time-shifting-and-scaling-of-functions.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://engineersphere.com/math/time-shifting-and-scaling-of-functions.html</link>
	<description>doesn&#039;t have to make sense to you, but it&#039;s probably great for your health.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 07:30:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://engineersphere.com/math/time-shifting-and-scaling-of-functions.html/comment-page-1#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 21:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engineersphere.com/?p=1317#comment-35</guid>
		<description>You are correct. I performed the time scaling and time shifting in opposite order. The signal should have been shifted by 6 seconds (3/(.5)) to the left and then scaled appropriately for the 1/2 factor. Updates on the way..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are correct. I performed the time scaling and time shifting in opposite order. The signal should have been shifted by 6 seconds (3/(.5)) to the left and then scaled appropriately for the 1/2 factor. Updates on the way..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tannerkorf</title>
		<link>http://engineersphere.com/math/time-shifting-and-scaling-of-functions.html/comment-page-1#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>tannerkorf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 08:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engineersphere.com/?p=1317#comment-34</guid>
		<description>I am pretty sure the flow of operations is: amplitude -&gt; time shift -&gt; time scale.

for f(at-b): You must first time shift by &#039;b&#039; to obtain f(t-b). Now time scale the shifted signal f(t-b) by &#039;a&#039; to obtain f(at-b).

or,

time scale f(t) by &#039;a&#039; to obtain f(at). Now time shift f(at) by &#039;b/a&#039; to obtain f(at-b).

From: Linear Systems book (Lathi)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am pretty sure the flow of operations is: amplitude -&gt; time shift -&gt; time scale.</p>
<p>for f(at-b): You must first time shift by &#8216;b&#8217; to obtain f(t-b). Now time scale the shifted signal f(t-b) by &#8216;a&#8217; to obtain f(at-b).</p>
<p>or,</p>
<p>time scale f(t) by &#8216;a&#8217; to obtain f(at). Now time shift f(at) by &#8216;b/a&#8217; to obtain f(at-b).</p>
<p>From: Linear Systems book (Lathi)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

